Ever since I started my running career, I have had issues with one aspect of workout technology: the heart rate monitor. A brief history, if I may.....
I did not start using any heart rate monitors right away; while I vaguely knew that there had to be some kind of device to measure heart rate, I did not put any thought into it. Then, at the starting line of my first race in 2014, all that changed. I was standing in the group (it was a really small race, no pens) trying to get out of everyone's way, figuring I would be a back of the packer. I was very nervous, just hoping that I would finish the race, when suddenly and without warning, my Garmin started to beep and vibrate uncontrollably. I look down, and the watch's face is flashing "180." I know it is reading heart rate, but I have no idea how, where, or why, and I figure that if my heart rate really is 180 at this point in time, I am probably dead. The race starts, my watch goes back to normal, and I finish the race, coming in last in my age group.
I started to consider using a heart rate monitor when I started to get serious about running on a treadmill. I had to get a foot pod to measure cadence, distance, and speed, so while looking for listings for accessories, heart rate monitors popped as well. I decided to splurge and purchase.
The Garmin HRM was easy to set up. It came with a 2032 battery, it paired with my watch quickly, and while the chest strap was a little difficult to clip on, it was comfortable to wear once you started running. So far, so good.
The pros were straightforward, the readings seemed accurate, and it was easy to set up and use. There were, however, a few cons. The first was the method by which the monitor communicated with the watch. Most technology involving sports fitness equipment works with Bluetooth, which is very popular for quality, ease of use, and use over different platforms. At the time of purchase, all Garmin products used a platform called ANT+, which I found very reliable but unable to use with my running app. I also had an issue with figuring out if it needed a new battery. There was no way to check the battery strength, and if you did not use the monitor after even a short period of time, it seems to have a problem connecting.
I shopped around to see if there was anything else, mostly looking for Bluetooth connectivity. I decided to try the Wahoo HRM for several reasons. It was Bluetooth compatible, there were lights on the front to signify that it was on, and it also made some other promises that seemed appealing. However, after it measured a short run on the Cape Cod bike path as going from Western Newfoundland to Equatorial Guinea, I decided to settle in on heart rate measuring.
I found some cons, and they were oddly similar to the Garmin. You could tell if the device was turned on at first, but I found that it dropped during the activity, and it was hard to tell if it was the battery or some other problem. A battery change helped for the first few workouts, but the drops would become more frequent after a while, and it seemed like accuracy was compromised. Time to do more research.
My investigation seemed to lead me down one of two roads. One road seemed to recommend either the Wahoo or the Garmin. Simply put, I wanted to try something else. The other road led me down a road that offered some options that were convenient and accurate but cost much more than I was willing to spend. One of the few alternatives was something called the Scosche Rhythm+.
| My Scosche Rhythm+ |
No comments:
Post a Comment